Mardi 2 juin 2009
2
02
/06
/Juin
/2009
00:00
I want to explain here why there's two films, and not how, where they have been made.
One is the mirror of the other one. The two films have exactly the same shots, but not in the same order. During the past week, it was impossible for me to know which of the two edits was the most
accurate. I even don't want to decide which is the best title, between "Two takes" (the one in the films) or "Takes two" (the one of this post and we can say the one of this global "conceptual
project").
It's up to you, you pick the first or the second, and watch the other one if you want to try.
For me, the films together may tell much more than only one of them. Somethink like what you thought was the end can now be the beginning, that an event can follow another or or be the souvenir of
the other. That no matter you think it over, you never know what will come first and what will come next.
Par Apostrophe
-
5
Ma question, moi, c'est pourquoi tu filmes tes rando en montagne ? ^^
2 - Magie du cinéma 1 : Vous faites une demi-heure de marche sur un sentier balisé d'un petit mont, et vous voilà en montagne (à Jeonju).
3 - Magie du cinéma 2 : si en plus vous refaites le son, vous masquez le fait qu'on entend encore vachement l'autoroute...